Home Papers Policy Agendas Project Other Projects Books Position Papers

Papers

Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions

Abstract: Political institutions translate inputs-in the form of changed preferences, new participants, new information, or sudden attention to previously-available information-into policy outputs. In the process they impose costs on this translation, and these costs increase institutional friction. We argue that the 'friction' in political institutions leads not to consistent 'gridlock' but to long periods of stasis interspersed with dramatic policy punctuations.

As political institutions add costs to the translation of inputs into outputs, institutional friction will increase, and outputs from the process will become increasingly punctuated overall. We use a stochastic process approach to compare the extent of punctuations among fifteen data sets that assess change in US government budgets, a variety of aspects of the public policy process, in election results, and in stock market returns in the US. We find that all of these distributions display positive kurtosis-tall central peaks (representing considerable stability) and heavy tails (reflecting the punctuations, both positive and negative). When we order institutions according to the costs they impose on collective action, those with higher decision and transaction costs generate more positive kurtosis. Direct parameter estimates indicate that all distributions save budget data were best fit by the double Exponential probability distribution; budgets are Paretian.

Home Papers Policy Agendas Project Other Projects Books Position Papers		Papers Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions Abstract: Political institutions translate inputs-in the form of changed preferences, new participants, new information, or sudden attention to previously-available information-into policy outputs. In the process they impose costs on this translation, and these costs increase institutional friction. We argue that the 'friction' in political institutions leads not to consistent 'gridlock' but to long periods of stasis interspersed with dramatic policy punctuations. As political institutions add costs to the translation of inputs into outputs, institutional friction will increase, and outputs from the process will become increasingly punctuated overall. We use a stochastic process approach to compare the extent of punctuations among fifteen data sets that assess change in US government budgets, a variety of aspects of the public policy process, in election results, and in stock market returns in the US. We find that all of these distributions display positive kurtosis-tall central peaks (representing considerable stability) and heavy tails (reflecting the punctuations, both positive and negative). When we order institutions according to the costs they impose on collective action, those with higher decision and transaction costs generate more positive kurtosis. Direct parameter estimates indicate that all distributions save budget data were best fit by the double Exponential probability distribution; budgets are Paretian.

2008 University of Texas at Austin. All Right Reserved. Credits and Acknowledgements \| Disclaimer \| Citation Guidelines
Home \| Codebooks \| Datasets \| Data Tools \| Publications \| News & Events \| Resources \| About Us \| Site Help \| Contact Us \| Site Map